Tuesday, December 3, 2013

Creativity in Knowledge



Surprisingly, King Collegiate High school does not teach in a manner that promotes memorization or multiple choice tests; yet their standardized test scores are high.

High school is supposed to prepare students for college, but as I mentioned in previous blog posts, schools are focused on memorization and multiple choice tests with one answer. Instead of teaching how to do well on the standardized tests KIPP King Collegiate High School is preparing its students for the rigors of college by empowering them with critical thinking skills. 

Teachers at KIPP are keeping their students engaged by asking questions that will allow them the power to critically think. One student Rose Elmer comments that, “Here at KIPP, I am challenged and it is difficult, but I like it”. Teachers are asking thought provoking questions and expect their students to comprehend, analyze, and evaluate a line of reasoning, a concept or problem relative to one’s own perspective and the perspective of others to arrive at a deeper understanding of their own. The school discusses topics of social justice issues that are happening in our society today, especially issues that relate to them.

For example, in Jared Kushida’s Global Politics War and Peace class students are discussing social justice issues questioning if the United States is justified in extraditing criminals from other countries. Here’s how the class discussion went:


By having conversations that make students think about the world in a different view and not just the United States sugar coated version; students are learning the perspectives of other people, important issues that affect different people, and can have their own opinions.

Critical thinking is different from what standardized tests have taught in the multiple choice test generation. Paulo Friere a lead advocate for critical thinking would agree that instead of students waiting for the banking concept of education to allow them to receive, fill and store useless facts in the deposits of their brains (Freire, P. 2000); students should communicate their understanding of the material and formulate their own opinions. His theories including the banking concept of education have created a model of how teaching critical thinking should be.

In the article, “Have we been KIPP-notized?” by researcher David Markus, one critique I would have to agree with is that KIPP King Collegiate High School may be excessively set ontheir mission to deliver their students to college armed with the tools ittakes to succeed. No reasonable effort is spared and no hours are long enough to achieve this transformative result. It seems a little extreme to force students to succeed through drilling the school’s mantra of, “Work hard, be nice.” The pressure to succeed may be alarming for many students who previously in their education away from KIPP have never had the motivation to be driven to go to college. Teachers put all their time into helping students succeed even if it means having classes going beyond the school day.

But at least students are prepared for college, working hard to achieve an education that allows them to be creative critical thinkers in which they are open to others’ perspectives and opinions rather than one set answer.


Reference List


Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum International Publishing Group


http://www.edutopia.org/blog/stw-kipp-critical-thinking-debunking-myths